A Roundtable Discussion on Inerrancy

Monday, 01 Mar 2010

It seems to me that critics of inerrancy sometimes share with fundamentalists a naive and modernistic set of assumptions about the way to read a series of covenantal documents.
Michael Horton recently had an engaging e-mail conversation on inerrancy with Michael Spencer, the "Internet Monk," and Donald Richmond, a presbyter and examining chaplain with the Reformed Episcopal Church. Here is what they had to say about this controversial topic. Horton: "The Bible, in its original autographs, is without error in all that it affirms." Shaped especially by B. B. Warfield and fleshed out in the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978), this particular formulation was forged in response to a growing reticence to identify the Word of ...

Partners and Subscribers Only

Login to access:

  • This Article
  • All Articles and Issues

Login

Not a partner? Sign-up.

Or, become a magazine subscriber

Types

LOGIN

Email Address
Password
Forgot Password?
OR
Signup for an account now