White Horse Inn Blog

Know what you believe and why you believe it

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

For Calvinism--Conversations

Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 133
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

With the release of Mike Horton's newest book For Calvinism conversations are beginning to take place. The first is with Westminster Seminary's Office Hours podcast where Mike discusses the book and why he wrote it. There is another conversation this coming Saturday at Biola University where Mike will be having a conversation with Roger Olson who wrote the companion volume Against Calvinism. Click here to find out more about this free event.

The WHI Store has For Calvinism on sale now for only $9.99! Click here to purchase


Overall Rating (0)

0 out of 5 stars

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

Your comments are subjected to administrator's moderation.
terms and condition.

People in this conversation

  • Please tell me that the Biola event will be recorded and later uploaded to the website in some format?

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Eric Landry

    Yes, several formats will be made available.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Mike

    Eric, Do you know when they will be available?

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Eric Landry

    No, we don't. Biola's film crew has all the footage right now. W're waiting to get everything from them.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Bill

    I am for Calvinism! That being said I do think that Arminius is mistakenly charged with universal grace, i.e. the assumption that Arminius taught that prevenient grace is made available to all men. Some accept it and some reject it. Although Arminius like Luther taught that grace can be resisted, he never taught that his grace is available to all. When it comes down to God's grace being available to a few, there's hardly a difference between John Calvin and Jacobus Arminius. The difference between Arminius and Calvin, lies whether grace which God makes available to some and denies to other is resistible or irresistible. Michael Horton in his book For Calvinism and I've also heard it on the White Horse Inn program from the other co-hosts mistakenly assume that Arminians taught that God made grace available to all individuals, who then accept or reject this grace. This is not true about Arminius, but I will let him answer this charge in his own words from his Apology or Defence,


    Article VIII
    Sufficient grace of the Holy Spirit is bestowed on those to whom the gospel is preached, whosoever they may be; so that, if they will, they may believe: otherwise, God would only be mocking mankind.


    At no time, either in public or in private, have I delivered this proposition in these words, or in any expressions that were of equivalent force, or that conveyed a similar meaning. This assertion I confidently make, even though a great number of persons might bear a contrary testimony. Because, unless this Article received a modified explanation, I neither approve of it at present, nor has it at any time obtained any portion of my approval. Of this fact it is in my power to afford evidence, from written conferences which I have had with other people on the same subject.

    In this Article there are three topics concerning which I am desirous of giving a suitable explanation.

    FIRST. Concerning the difference which subsists among the persons to whom the gospel is preached. Frequent mention of this difference is made in the scriptures, and particularly in the following passages. "I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes." (Matt. xi, 25.) The explanation of these words may be discovered in 1 Corinthians 1 and 2. "Into whatsoever city or town ye shall enter, inquire who in it is worthy; and there abide till ye go thence. And when ye come into a house, salute it. And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it; but. if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you." (Matt. x, 11- 13.) The Jews of Berea "were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind," &c. (Acts xvii, 11.) "Pray for us, that the word of the Lord may have free course, and be glorified, even as it is with you; and that we may be delivered from unreasonable and wicked men. For all men have not faith. But the Lord is faithful," &c. (2 Thess. iii, 1, 2.)

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Bill


    SECONDLY. Concerning the bestowing of sufficient grace what is to be understood by such a gift? It is well known, that there is habitual grace, and [the grace of] assistance. Now the phraseology of the article might be understood according to this acceptation, as though some kind of habitual grace were infused into all those to whom the gospel is preached, which would render them apt or inclined to give it credence, or believe the gospel. But this interpretation of the. phrase is one of which I do not approve. But this SUFFICIENCY, after all that is said about it, must, in my opinion, be ascribed to the assistance of the Holy Spirit, by which he assists the preaching of the gospel, as the organ, or instrument, by which He, the Holy Spirit, is accustomed to be efficacious in the hearts of the hearers. But it is possible to explain this operation of the assistance of the Holy Spirit, in a manner so modified and appropriate, and such sufficiency may be ascribed to it, as to keep at the greatest possible distance from Pelagianism.

    THIRDLY. Concerning the expression, "By this grace they may believe, if they will." These words, when delivered in such a crude and undigested form, are capable of being brought to bear a very bad interpretation, and a meaning not at all agreeable to the scriptures, as though, after that power had been bestowed, the Holy Spirit and Divine Grace remain entirely quiescent, waiting to see whether the man will properly use the power which he has received, and will believe the gospel. When, on the contrary, he who wishes to entertain and to utter correct sentiments on this subject, will account it necessary to ascribe to Grace its own province, which, indeed, is the principal one, in persuading the human will that it may be inclined to yield assent to those truths which are preached.

    This exposition completely frees me from the slightest suspicion of heresy on the point here mentioned; and proves it to be a report not entitled to the least credit, that I have employed such expressions, as I am unwilling to admit, except with the addition of a sound and proper explanation.

    In reference to the REASON which is appended to this proposition, that, otherwise, God would only be mocking mankind, I confess it to be a remark which several adversaries employ against the opinion entertained by many of our divines, to convict it of absurdity. And it is not used without just cause, which might easily have been demonstrated, had it pleased the inventors of these Articles, (instead of ascribing them to me,) to occupy themselves in openly declaring on this subject their own sentiments, which they keep carefully concealed within their own bosoms.

    Like 0 Short URL: