White Horse Inn Blog

Know what you believe and why you believe it

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

WHI-1052 | Dealing with Objections to the Resurrection

Posted by on in 2011 Show Archive
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 124
  • 2 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print
When telling others about the message of the gospel, objections of various kinds inevitably arise. So how are we to answer the person who claims that Jesus never really died on the cross, or that the miracle stories associated with Christ are complete fabrications? The hosts discuss these questions and more as they interact with some of the claims made by skeptic Michael Shermer in his recent WHI interview. Joining the panel for this discussion is Craig Parton, author of Religion on Trial and The Defense Never Rests.

When telling others about the message of the gospel, objections of various kinds inevitably arise. So how are we to answer the person who claims that Jesus never really died on the cross, or that the miracle stories associated with Christ are complete fabrications? The hosts discuss these questions and more as they interact with some of the claims made by skeptic Michael Shermer in his recent WHI interview. Joining the panel for this discussion is Craig Parton, author of Religion on Trial and The Defense Never Rests.





RECOMMENDED BOOKS
Religion on Trial
Craig Parton
Holman QuickSource Guide to Apologetics
Doug Powell
Resurrection iWitness iPad App
Doug Powell




PROGRAM AUDIO

[audio:http://www.whitehorseinn.org/whiarchives/2011whi1052jun05.mp3|titles=WHI 1052|artists=White Horse Inn]


MUSIC SELECTION

Matthew Smith

0
Trackback URL for this blog entry.

Overall Rating (0)

0 out of 5 stars

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
Your comments are subjected to administrator's moderation.
terms and condition.

People in this conversation

  • Guest - Bob Barrett

    Would any of the hosts be willing to dig a bit deeper into the discussion surrounding Shermer's comments on the claims of Mormonism? I didn't quite wrap my head around the arguments. Specifically, I'm interested in learning how our claim differs from the Mormon claim solely on the merits of the evidence. Our claim is that the evidence regarding historical events surrounding Christ's death and resurrection is utterly compelling for a number of reasons. Through the documentation of eyewitness accounts, (in both Biblical and secular sources), we can verify Christ's person and works, verify death by crucifixion, and certify that his real self was seen post-crucifixion fully functional again. Shermer's question was, in essence, "how is our evidence of those claims different than the evidence given by the Mormons?" Dr. Riddlebarger offered for one, that some math had been done on the weight of the golden tablets and found them to surpass the weight a normal human could carry around. I'm not as smart as you guys, but I don't understand that argument, because the claim that it's implausible for a person to determine to carry 800lbs of gold seems like the lesser claim when set next to ours (that a person was resurrected from the dead). Additionally, the DNA evidence of American Indians vs. Hebrew DNA was mentioned, and I'm sure the Mormon's have some way around that.

    So despite the miraculous and implausible nature of our claim, we believe it. We believe it ultimately because God has purposed to lift the veil from our eyes so that we no longer suppress the truth in unrighteousness, but from a human perspective we believe it based on the fact that we have good documents of eyewitness accounts, all the surrounding facts lend to the truth of our claim, and it cannot be disproved. The question is then, however implausible the Mormon claim is (heavy gold, DNA discrepancies, etc.), if they too have good documents (eyewitness accounts and affidavits), and nobody was around at the time to produce a document disproving Joseph Smith's claims (I don't know either way), what arguments can we use to show the claims must be false?

    Also, thanks so much, all of you, for your dedication to this teaching ministry. It's one of my most treasured blessings.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Bill Fawcett

    Would love to hear you guys discuss Bill Johnson's claim that Jesus was born again (in hell). Very similar to the WoF JDS heresy. Google it.

    Like 0 Short URL: