White Horse Inn Blog

Know what you believe and why you believe it

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Steve Martin's Atheist Gospel Song

Posted by on in Funny
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 105
  • 4 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print
We found this over at the Huffington Post and had to pass it on. From the HP:

One of the stops on that tour was the venerable live music program Austin City Limits, and Martin and the Steep Canyon Rangers, a vocal quartet, performed an original composition. Lamenting that religious people have the best music, they decry the fact that nonreligious people are left in the proverbial dust when it comes to music proclaiming their beliefs. Check out the performance of "Atheists Don't Have No Songs" below.

Enjoy!

0
Tagged in: atheism humor

Overall Rating (0)

0 out of 5 stars

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
Your comments are subjected to administrator's moderation.
terms and condition.

People in this conversation

  • Fun.
    Thanks for sharing.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - G. Kyle Essary

    Some of the atheists at HuffPo were angry in the comments that Martin (an agnostic himself) \misrepresented\ atheism. They oddly went on to argue that atheism isn't a belief system at all, but merely a lack of beliefs. They were very defensive toward those who said atheists believe God doesn't exist (because then they have to defend that proposition, which is very difficult to do) using cliches like atheism being a religion like bald being a hair color.

    So let me get this straight:

    1. Atheism consists of no positive beliefs, but only a lack of beliefs.
    2. This non-existent \lack\ has enough coherence to be named \atheism.\
    3. Atheism (which I remind you has no ontological value since it is merely a \lack\) can affect other views about reality such as beliefs about the foundation of logic, morality, basis of empirical reality, et. al. such that they argue positively toward accepting this worldview in the comment section at HuffPo.
    4. This ontological lack can be misrepresented by a comedic song.
    5. Yet even though this worldview can be misrepresented, affects other basic beliefs about reality and provides a basis to critique other metaphysical positions, it doesn't have to be defended because it amounts to nothing more than a lack of beliefs...

    Am I the only one who finds this position to be both incoherent and self-contradictory?

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - Greg S.

    G. Kyle - Relax dude! It's a lighthearted ditty. I don't think Steve is starting an Atheist Church.

    Like 0 Short URL:
  • Guest - G. Kyle Essary

    Greg,
    Apparently you didn't read my comment before responding to it. I found the video to be really funny. My comment had nothing to do with the video or anything about Steve Martin starting an atheist church. Reading the comment would make that clear.

    My comment was responding to the commenters at HuffPo who took the video seriously and were offended that it misrepresented their worldview, but then refused to define their worldview as anything more than a lack. It just seems inconsistent.

    Like 0 Short URL: