Review of Jesus Calling
As far back as you can recall, you’ve started or ended the day with a time of personal meditation on God’s Word and prayer. Only this time, you try something different. You want to hear Jesus speak to you personally. So you take out pen and paper and record the results. As she tells us in her introduction, this is what happened when Sarah Young sought a deeper sense of the presence of Jesus. The result is the daily devotional, Jesus Calling: Enjoying Peace in His Presence (Thomas Nelson, 2004). The book has taken off since it was first published. It now includes a variety of supplements and has even been turned into a NKJV study Bible.
The author states up front that, unlike Scripture, the words she reports from Jesus are not inerrant. Nevertheless, she presents them as first-person speech from Jesus himself. “I knew that God communicated with me through the Bible,” she says, “but I yearned for more.” “Increasingly, I wanted to hear what God had to say to me personally on a given day.” That “more” was “the Presence of Jesus,” something beyond the ordinary means of grace. “So I was ready to begin a new spiritual quest,” beginning with Andrew Murray’s The Secret of the Abiding Presence. After reading God Calling, she relates, “I began to wonder if I, too, could receive messages during my times of communing with God.”
Preparing for an interview today on the topic, I read through Jesus Calling. A few reflections: first touching on the method and then on the message.
The Method
In Romans 10, Paul ties the method of salvation to the message: Just as God has saved us in Christ, apart from our works, he has chosen a method of delivering this gift that puts us on the receiving end. We don’t have to ascend into heaven or descend to the depths to find Christ, according to Scripture. “But what does it say? ‘The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,’ that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming” (v 8). “So faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of Christ” (v 17).
Jesus Christ, who rose from the dead, is the Word Incarnate; his speech is the very word of God. Proving his claims by his resurrection from the dead, he also commissioned his apostles as his ambassadors. Their speech in his name is his speech. Furthermore, when that word is proclaimed and read today, it is the very Word of God. Preaching involves teaching and exhortation, but it is more than that; it is Christ himself commanding, absolving, justifying, renewing, sanctifying, and assuring us. Christ could not be closer to you than he is by his Word and Spirit.
Neither Christ nor the Spirit speaks today apart from his Word. It is through the public ministry of preaching and the sacraments that the Holy Spirit unites us to Christ with all of his benefits. When we meditate on Scripture privately or in our family devotions, it is an extension of that public ministry. The preached Word calls us “out of ourselves,” as the Westminster Shorter Catechism puts it, binding us to Christ and therefore to his body. It is not simply a private affair in the garden, alone, whose joy “none other has ever known,” as the Keswick-inspired hymn has it (“In the Garden”). It was this point that separated the churches of the Reformation not only from Rome but from the Anabaptists.
Yet evangelicalism is a river into which various streams converge. The Reformers discovered in Scripture an inseparable connection between the public and the private, the external and the internal, the formal and the informal. However, radical Protestantism has frequently set the latter over the former. Sure, the external Word matters, but it’s the word that Jesus or the Spirit speaks directly to each of us every day that matters more. “Something more” is the essence of what the Reformers called “enthusiasm.”
In terms of method, then, Jesus Calling is a “something more” book. At the very least, I believe that it encourages believers to see God’s Word as hum-drum and to ascend into the heavens or descend to the depths to discover a word that will make Jesus more present in our daily lives. According to the Reformation stream of evangelicalism, God speaks to us in his Word (the arrow pointing down from God to us) and we speak to him in prayer (the arrow directed up to God). However, Jesus Calling confuses the direction of these arrows, blurring the distinction between God’s speech and our response.
The Message
In terms of content, the message is reducible to one point: Trust me more in daily dependence and you’ll enjoy my presence.
There are some good points. Jesus, according to the author, doesn’t promise a problem-free life; trials are opportunities for growth spurts. He’s in charge and works everything together for our good. Don’t seek Jesus merely to confirm your own plans for the day, but be transformed by his purposes. And above all, fix your eyes on Jesus.
Yet I kept asking, “What purposes”? “Who is Jesus and why should I fix my eyes on him?” In short, the gospel is taken for granted. When exhortations to trust are separated from a clear proclamation of who Christ is, what he has done, and why he is therefore trustworthy, trust simply becomes a work—something that I need to gin up within myself.
The substance of the book is drawn from the wells of the Keswick or “higher life/victorious life” movement that B. B. Warfield critiqued so thoroughly at the turn of the twentieth century in his massive study, Perfectionism. Based on the Wesleyan notion of two acts of faith—one for justification and another for sanctification, the Keswick teaching calls believers to enter into the “higher life.” While they are saved, many believers fail to experience the presence of Jesus in their daily lives. By “surrendering all,” letting go of their attachment to the things of this world, and striving to enter into this realm of ultimate peace, believers can attain a perpetual state of victory. As Warfield pointed out, the movement exhibited a deep inner contradiction in its message. On the one hand, you aren’t supposed to do anything, but simply rest in Jesus. Leave off striving! On the other hand, there are many things that you have to strive to do in order to enter into the higher life. Warfield traced the lineage back to Germany mysticism.
Andrew Murray (1828-1917) was a classic spiritual writer in this stream and his book, The Secret of the Abiding Presence, has been a staple of Keswick piety. Murray’s emphases are replete throughout Jesus Calling. The only difference is that they are placed on the lips of Jesus himself.
Compared with the Psalms, for example, Jesus Calling is remarkably shallow. I do not say that with a snarky tone, but with all seriousness. The Psalms first place before us the mighty acts of God and then call us to respond in confession, trust, and thankfulness. But in Jesus Calling I’m repeatedly exhorted to look to Christ, rest in Christ, trust in Christ, to be thankful and long for a deeper sense of his presence, with little that might provoke any of this. Which means that I’m directed not actually to Christ but to my own inner struggle to be more trustful, restful, and thankful.
Consequently, trust becomes a work. Nothing depends on us, but everything depends on us. Strive to stop striving. Then, “Save your best striving for seeking my face” (71). “Thankfulness opens the door to My Presence…I have empowered you to open or close that door” (215). You can achieve the victorious life through living in deep dependence on Me” (6). “Every time you affirm your trust in me, you put a coin into my treasury. Thus you build up equity in preparation for days of trouble. I keep safely in My heart all trust invested in Me, with interest compounded continuously. The more you trust Me, the more I empower you to do so…Store up for yourself treasure in heaven, through placing your trust in Me. This practice will keep you in My Peace.”
The first mention of Christ even dying for our sins appears on February 28 (page 61). The next reference (to wearing Christ’s robe) is August 9 (p. 232). Even the December readings focus on a general presence of Jesus in our hearts and daily lives, without anchoring it in Jesus’s person and work in history.
As in Keswick spirituality more generally, trust becomes an inner virtue that grows by its exercise. “The more you choose to trust Me, the easier it becomes,” Jesus allegedly says. “Thought patterns of trust become etched into your brain.” This has more in common with Aristotle than with the Apostles. The latter taught that faith comes—and is strengthened—by hearing God’s Word proclaimed.
Reading Jesus Calling, I was reminded of the confusing message of my Christian youth. Longing for “something more,” I pored over my mother’s bookshelf: Thomas a Kempis’ Imitation of Christ, D. L. Moody, Bill Bright, and Andrew Murray. Only with the discovery of the Reformers and various Puritan writers was I offered a liberating alternative that drew me out of myself to cling to Christ. While looking to this Reformation stream for a cluster of doctrines, many in the history of pietism have looked for “something more” elsewhere. Luther and Calvin may be great guides on understanding salvation, but we find our spirituality in medieval and modern alternatives. Yet Reformation piety directs us to the Word, always to the Word, where Christ speaks to us every time it is preached and his sacraments are administered in his name. When we come to this Word, in public and in private, we never need something more.


March 5th, 2013 at 11:34 am
[...] http://www.whitehorseinn.org/blog/2013/03/05/review-of-jesus-calling/ Share this:EmailPrintFacebookTwitterMoreRedditDiggStumbleUponLinkedInTumblrPinterestGoogle +1Like this:Like Loading… Search This Blog [...]
March 6th, 2013 at 4:30 am
Thank you so much for this review. This book is finding its way into conservative, Reformed churches and into the hands of many women (and maybe men) who don’t know what it’s actually saying. If you just read some of the daily devotions, it’s not horrible, but if you read the Introduction, you cannot help but notice that this woman is putting her words as the words of Christ and passing them off as such. Even her conversion was odd–”She was enveloped by a warm mist, whispered, “Sweet Jesus” and knew she was saved”. And from what I have read of “God Calling” on the internet, “Jesus Calling” is very, very similar. We so need discernment in this day and age or we will all be snared by the wiles of the devil. I’m so glad I don’t have to work for my salvation–I wasn’t doing such a great job at it to begin with. But I am also glad that I don’t have to jump through hoops to come into the presence of God and hear His Word. I love the saying, “If you want to hear God’s voice, read the Word. If you want to hear God’s audibly, read the Word out loud.” Jesus promised to never leave us nor forsake us in HEB and in IS and PS, God says He is always with us. What more do these writers want?
March 6th, 2013 at 5:34 am
Thank you for these thoughts! I am always skeptical of something that becomes so popular so quickly because Truth is offensive and not an easy pill to swallow. But, it is hard to talk to people who have greatly benefitted (in their eyes) from this book and articulate why it needs to be tested.
March 6th, 2013 at 6:10 am
Yet the “clinging” so soften cited by those who oppose a more Keswickian approach tends to descend into little more than strenuous intellectual comprehension that is at odds with the more emotional connection people long to have with Jesus.
Having talked with folks on both sides of this issue, I find that neither side seems to have found what the other side says it possesses. Each side has simply whitewashed its one-sidedness and called itself complete. Outsiders notice this immediately, but insiders never do.
March 6th, 2013 at 6:44 am
[...] read Michael Horton’s short review of a recent devotional book. A few comments struck me. This is [...]
March 6th, 2013 at 9:35 am
Thank you Dr. Horton, for using the finely tuned skill of discernment to expose a subtle, dangerous error. Sometimes I have trouble articulating such things in the moment of truth when someone asks me about a book or teaching like Jesus Calling – and I realize how crafty and wise Satan really is… and then I realize how needful it is that I know His Word, and Church history.
And there are few role models like Dr. Horton to help me learn this narrow way of walking and shepherding.
Grateful,
Justin Esposito
March 6th, 2013 at 9:49 am
“Neither Christ nor the Spirit speaks today apart from his Word.” Really? Doesn’t Acts record God speaking, correcting, and guiding through Peter’s vision and Paul’s? Listen I’ve graduated from a Reformed seminary. Full disclosure: I am frankly wrestling with the limitations of reformed theology. Part of what I fear about it is it’s misuse by way of what I call “reductionism.” I am not a loosey-goosey fan of God in mists, etc. but don’t you think it risks incredible arrogance to say God NEVER speaks apart from His Word? You think that is a box that the God of the universe puts Himself in? Can we talk about “objective means of grace” (Word and sacraments) as ultimate comfort and assurance, but not dismiss the value of subjective means of grace (peace after a prayer, for example) that God may sometimes chose to give? I fear today’s reformation stream has said more than the original reformers out of their reaction to legitimate abuses. I also fear that Reformation reductionism speaks only to the mind, and acts as if “heart, soul, and strength” are not part of how we love God or He choses to love us. Anyone want to dialogue with me about this, or will I just be dismissed– or worse! dissected?
March 6th, 2013 at 11:13 am
[...] http://www.whitehorseinn.org/blog/2013/03/05/review-of-jesus-calling/ [...]
March 6th, 2013 at 12:03 pm
Mike, I was a friend with Sarah at CTS and a classmate. I have always been uncomfortable with her book. I failed to take time to read it thoroughly or critique it adequately. Thank you for doing so.
At Covenant College I studied the victorious life movement and eventually confronted the author of The Green Letters..can’t remember his name now (he was a patron at the restaurant I worked at in the summer in Colorado Springs).
Glad I found this on facebook. Have you talked with Sarah about your criticism?
Cat (sis in law to Rick)
March 6th, 2013 at 1:02 pm
[...] Horton has a very perceptive review of Sarah Young’s bestseller, Jesus Calling. Here are the closing paragraphs: Compared with [...]
March 6th, 2013 at 1:51 pm
This book, Jesus Calling, has been brought to my attention lately by several women via conversation and facebook posts, so I decided to do some research.
It was not a big seller when it was first published in 2004.
The “Two Listeners” who wrote, God Calling, were a part of (Frank) Buchmanism or Oxford group. It was a “moralistic” movement to sweep across the world in the 1900′s. It was renamed the Moral Re-armament in 1938. another name change to Initiatives of Change in 2001. Supposedly it began as a “christian movement.”
Genuine christians were caught up with the wave of hysteria and would join them and then soon realize that the premise of the group was false and would leave and go back to “ordinary” church.
One of the four “absolutes” they adhered to was sitting in daily “quiet time” privately or in a group and journal what God was “speaking” to them.
Another “absolute” was having “house parties” where they would sit and confess their sins to one another. Apparently some of these parties became mainly a time to brag about all of the gross sins they had committed rather than godly sorrow which leads to repentance. They would clap after each person confessed. (welcome recovery group therapy.)
Bill Wilson, a co-founder of A.A. (Think – Higher Power) was also a part of the Oxford Group.
So, this movement which spawned the Two Listeners of God Calling, editor, A. J. Russell, was one of the influences for Sarah Young (her words) sitting and listening to Jesus.
I’m guessing she didn’t do background research on the anonymous Two Listeners before delving into such a practice of “quiet time.” I think she was just looking for “something more.”
Maybe she is in a season of discovery and the Lord will lead her beyond such silliness. It is a quiet and seductive deception laden with a feel good “Presence”.
I know I would not want my journals from years ago to be published, craziness. (I plan to throw them out!)
Anyway, this Oxford Group is quite a trail of discovery when researched. I had never heard of them before.
“Quiet time”…from them…who knew?!
March 6th, 2013 at 2:12 pm
Any suggestions on further reading regarding the differences between Keswick and Reformed Theology?
March 6th, 2013 at 3:35 pm
I have both books mentioned, “Jesus Calling,” and “God Calling.” The introduction in “God Calling”, from the two listeners, says,
“We felt all unworthy and overwhelmed by the wonder of it, and could hardly realize that we were being taught, trained and encouraged day by day by Him (Jesus) personally, when millions of souls, far worthier, had to be content with guidance from the Bible, sermons, their churches, books and other resources.”
This concerned me because the Bible didn’t seem to hold a very precious place for these two ladies. Unfortunately I don’t think they tested the spirit that they were apparently in contact with. The entry for Dec. 24th, supposedly from Christ Jesus himself reads,
“Yes! but remember the first Hail must be that of the Magi in the Bethlehem stable.” —-WHAT! This spirit who claims to be “Jesus” apparently doesn’t remember that the shepherds came first, THEN the magi showed up quite awhile later, like almost two years late, and it wasn’t at the stable. Why does “Jesus” contradict the Biblical account of his own birth to these ladies? The answer is, because these ladies were NOT hearing from Jesus Christ, God Eternal, or the Holy Spirit. In another entry on pg. 60 “Jesus” tells them, “I need you more than you need me.” This flies in the face of our need for a savior, a redeemer, a sacrifice for sins. How can Jesus need us more than we need him? This is very sad and I think these ladies were deceived, by what I don’t know, either a demonic spirit, their own imaginations or both. When someone claims to speak for Jesus Christ himself, and it doesn’t match w/ God’s account, the Bible, don’t listen. I could go on about this book that exalts itself against the Word of God, the falsities are many but lets move on to the other book by Sarah Young, “Jesus Calling.”
Sarah Young read the above mentioned book, “God Calling” and was so inspired that she decided to receive messages from Jesus too. On June 14th, pg 173, she received this from Jesus, “Sometimes you felt naked–exposed to the revealing Light of My Presence. I wrapped an ermine robe around you: My robe of righteousness. I sang you a Love song, whose beginning and end are veiled in eternity.” Jesus is going to cloth us with fur? He already did that in the Garden of Eden as a temporary covering. He does not need to kill an animal to cover us. His blood was shed once for all. Here again we have something that just doesn’t jive w/ what God’s Word says. If these were just her ideas and thoughts then we would not have to be so concerned. However, when anyone claims to get direct revelation from God and it doesn’t line up with God’s Word then we have a problem. God calls us to preach the Word.
II Timothy 3:16—17 “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be COMPLETE, thoroughly equipped for EVERY good work.”
Then Paul said, “PREACH THE WORD!”
March 6th, 2013 at 4:59 pm
So I decided to try striving to “hear what God says to me personally on a given day”–and you know what? It’s working! I just heard the following loud and clear:
“Learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another. … If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book … If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”
Rats, I’m getting static now. I was really hoping to hear more about that ermine robe…
March 6th, 2013 at 9:20 pm
Dr. Horton,
I assume ‘Keswick’ you are talking about is known as the Keswick Convention. Is that right?
Also, the first time I heard about Keswick Convention was in a summer retreat hosted by many of the followers of Watchman Nee. Do you think there is some relationships (or similarities) between Keswick teaching and the teachings of Nee’s Local Church?
March 6th, 2013 at 10:36 pm
I love your emphasis on “Solo Scriptura” and would say a hardy “Amen” to that. Most average Christians ignore the Bible, except maybe on Sunday, and must become workmen not ashamed rightly dividing the word of truth. Instead, too many Bibles sit gathering dust in each household.
However, to say: “Neither Christ nor the Spirit speaks today apart from his Word.” is a non-biblical statement and most of the Old and New Testament show numerous examples of God speaking to individauals. This statement is man trying to limit what The Almighty can or cannot do. (Yes, I understand that abuses can occur and we dare not ignore or contradict the Word.) Many of us are in danger of worshipping Father, Son, and Holy Bible- leaving out the inner witness and teacher the Holy Spirit which connects us to an intimate God.
March 7th, 2013 at 12:10 am
@ Jeremiah Ketchum
There is a book called “Christ the Lord: The Reformation and Lordship Salvation” which is put together by Michael Horton and features chapters from himself and other reformed authors and pastors, including one Lutheran. On the other side of the debate was a guy named Zane Hodges who espoused a kind of keswick theology. It’s a great historical treatment of the subject while also correcting some of the legalism from John Macarthur and others of that view. An appendix has the article by B. B. Warfield that he referred to in this article of Lewis Sperry Chafer’s “He that is Spiritual.”
Furthermore, I recommend picking up a Reformed systematic theology (like Michael Horton’s, or try the new “Pilgrim Theology”). The reason is that the theology overall is the exact opposite of everything you’ll find in keswick books on just about any subject.
March 7th, 2013 at 2:53 am
@Jeremiah,
Take a look at Andy Naselli’s work “Let Go and Let God?” (http://andynaselli.com/let-go-and-let-god). Related (and free) resources here: http://andynaselli.com/lectures-on-keswick-theology.
March 7th, 2013 at 9:21 am
Dear Dr. Horton,
Thank you for your comments on JESUS CALLING. You make some valid points, which I appreciate, such as “Preaching involves teaching and exhortation, but it is more than that; it is Christ himself commanding, absolving,justifying,renewing,sanctifying, and assuring us.” I would also agree that more emphasis of Christ’s atoning sacrifice on the Cross should be placed within the pages of this book. Finally, I applaud you for recognizing the book’s good points.
However, there are other positions you make which I disagree with. For example, you put forth that JESUS CALLING “encourages believers to see God’s Word as hum-drum……..” If anything this book reinforced my belief based on Scripture that it is in Christ alone through Christ alone where my true salvation lies. Furthermore, you maintain that in this book, “I’m directed not actually to Christ, but to my own inner struggle to be more trustful, restful, and thankful.” I part company with you here. I found that this book encouraged me to look to Christ to guide and walk with me through my struggle to be more trustful, restful, etc. Does not Paul speak of his own struggle with sin in Romans 7:14-24? And does not Paul also describe in 2 Timothy 4:7 that becoming like Christ is a journey which takes one’s entire life time and is similar to a rigorous “race” or a “good fight?” Finally your position lacks sensitivity to the fact that people hear Christ speak to them not only through His written Word preached and proclaimed, but in other ways which are in harmony with Scripture, such as quiet meditation or contemplation as it is spoken of in Isaiah 30:15 and Psalm 46:10.
March 7th, 2013 at 12:16 pm
I think the confusion comes when people say that “God spoke to them.” In many circles it is very popular. But, when one asks them what exactly God said to them in that moment, what is described is various feelings, thoughts, images, and impressions. That really isn’t speaking at all! God does promise to give wisdom (that’s the subjective part of life in Christ), but to say that God spoke…well, that’s revelation. It is interesting too to note how often Paul and the early church had to make decisions based on what “seemed good” them and even had strong disagreements(e.g. Paul and Barnabas). If they could have just “listened to Jesus” as the author proposes, the issue of John Mark going on the second missionary journey wouldn’t have been an issue at all. They would have prayed, listened, and received a message. But, alas, they didn’t play the “God spoke to me card”. They disagreed with each other. The church prayed over each of them. And, they continued forward with the mission. Paul went one direction. Barnabas the other. And God blessed them both.
March 7th, 2013 at 1:56 pm
Wow. I don’t even know where to begin. This is my first visit to your site. I was searching for “charismatic and reformed” and happened on your strident opinions. Our associate pastor has quoted you to me recently and now I know why.
All your ramblings make me throw up my hands and head for the nearest exit i.e. back to my boyhood Catholicism. At least there is room to breathe there. Your straightjacket Christianity is neither instructive nor encouraging nor is it meant to be, I suppose.
You criticize Young, et al for encouraging, as you say, “Strive to stop striving.” What do you do with, “Let us therefore strive (spoudazō) to enter that rest…” (Hebrews 4:11a ESV)
I’m sure you’re smarter than me and probably have a great answer and, here in, lies the problem: If everyone is not as smart as you then there’s no hope for us ill-informed, biblically illiterate, dumb Christians to ever attain to the lofty goal of “pure” doctrine” – like you have. Hopefully, someday you can take a deep breath in that rarefied air.
March 7th, 2013 at 3:52 pm
Thanks for the interaction.
A number of responses have objected to restricting the Spirit’s communication to his Word. We don’t seem to disagree over whether Scripture is the infallible rule, but whether it’s sufficient: that is, whether we need or should expect other avenues of divine communication today. Let me first clarify the point and then defend it briefly.
It’s not a question of what God can do, but what he’s promised to do. Tomorrow morning, Jesus could speak to me in audible words outside of Scripture, but why to me and not to someone else? Scripture is a public book that may be accessed anytime. Jesus, who rose again publicly in history, certified the Old Testament and commissioned his apostles to speak his words in his name. Preaching is a public event. This public character of the gospel distinguishes Christianity from every other religion. I’ll leave it to others to discern whether Sarah Young tends to treat Scripture and preaching as “humdrum,” given her clear statement in the introduction that she was seeking more communication—something more personal—from Jesus than she had found in reading the Bible. (She doesn’t even mention preaching, as I recall.)
Now to the defense. To be sure, there are myriad examples of God speaking directly to people in the Old and New Testaments. After all, that’s how we got Scripture in the first place. However, Jesus equated the words of the prophets with the very word of God and submitted himself to the Scriptures (Mt 4:4, 7, 10; 5:17-20; 19:4-6; 26:31, 52-54; Lk 4:16-21; 16:17; 18:31-33; 22:37; 24:25-27, 45-47; Jn 10:35-38). He also drew a qualitative distinction between “word of God” and “the tradition of the elders” (Mt 15:2, 6). The one is God’s infallible word and the other is a fallible interpretation of God’s word. Yet the words of Christ and his apostles in Scripture are also the very word of God for the new covenant era: “God-breathed” and therefore sufficient (2 Tim 3:16). The Old and New Testaments form the biblical canon—like a constitution—that cannot be altered (Dt 4:2; 12:32; Rev 22:18-19).
Like the era of the prophets, the era of the apostles is unique. Paul distinguishes between the foundation-laying era of the apostles and the ordinary ministers who follow (1 Cor 3:11-12). The scriptures are inspired by the Spirit; we are illumined by the same Spirit to understand them. Just as the prophetic era was followed by the teachers (rabbis) who interpreted their inspired writing, the apostolic era was followed by pastors and teachers. The apostles said and did things that the Spirit did not deem necessary for us to know, as did those who prophesied in the Book of Acts. However, Paul warns, “Do not go beyond what is written,” since appeals to private revelation breed factions (1 Cor 4:6).
Churches of the Reformation hold that when this Word is faithfully preached, Christ himself speaks. “So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Rom 10:17). It is through the preaching of the gospel that the Spirit creates and sustains our faith in Christ (Is 55:10-11; Ezek 37; Acts 2:14-36; Rom 1:16; 2 Cor 4:3, 6; 1 Pet 1:23-25).
In short, as Luther and Calvin both said, to look for another path, another means of communication from our Lord, is to “seek him outside the way.” The only safe place to find a holy God in mercy, clothed in his gospel, is where he has promised to meet us in peace.
March 7th, 2013 at 4:59 pm
I’m very thankful for this review. My daughter received this book as a gift and my husband and I set it aside because the tone just hit us the wrong way. You’ve done a wonderful job articulating our concerns with the book.
March 7th, 2013 at 5:00 pm
Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.
(Hebrews 1:1-2)
God spoke, in the past, through prophets, but now he HAS spoken to us by his Son. The whole intent of God’s message can be summarized by the person and work of the Divine Logos, Jesus Christ. The need for extrabiblical revelation speaks more to the desire of people to experience God apart from the means he has provided, and told us about in his word. We see throughout Scripture that no one speaks directly to God apart from a mediator, and we should not seek otherwise. Christ has established the normal means by which we communicate to God, through prayer, and he to us, through His word and sacrament.
March 7th, 2013 at 5:41 pm
Thank you for your article. I have friends that are very devoted to reading Jesus Calling, on a daily basis. I purchased this book but one day, as I was reading, a very overwhelming uncomfortableness came over me. I struggled with the ‘first person’ writing. I immediately put it down and have not picked it up since then.
March 7th, 2013 at 6:07 pm
I found a short and concise summary of Keswick theology written by Andy Naselli on the Ligonier website: http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/why-let-go-and-let-god-bad-idea/
Few excerpts:
“Keswick theology is pervasive because countless people have propagated it in so many ways, especially in sermons and devotional writings. It is appealing because Christians struggle with sin and want to be victorious in that struggle now. Keswick theology offers a quick fix, and its shortcut to instant victory appeals to genuine longings for holiness.”
“We shouldn’t determine our view of sanctification by counting up who we perceive to be the most holy Christians and seeing which view has the most. Scripture, and Scripture alone, must determine our view of sanctification. As John Murray reminds us, ‘The cause neither of truth nor of love is promoted by suppressing warranted criticism.’ Constructively criticizing a faulty view of sanctification can actually advance the cause of truth and love.”
March 7th, 2013 at 6:08 pm
Thank you so much for this review! God has blessed me through you wisdom and discrenment!
March 7th, 2013 at 6:37 pm
It boils down to a sufficiency of Scripture issue. Scripture testifies of itself that it is sufficient (as Dr. Horton and others have already pointed out).
When people look to things like “Jesus Calling” or “God Calling” or try to hear a special/specific/personal revelation from God, they are in fact saying that Scripture is deficient. Thanks for faithful review Dr. Horton.
March 7th, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Dr. Horton:
You still have not defended your dogmatic statement that cannot be found in Scripture that: “Neither Christ nor the Spirit speaks today apart from his Word.” You have skirted that issue almost successfully and skillfully. I admire that deftness.
Please justify with objective truth, since you abhor the subjective, your statement: “Neither Christ nor the Spirit speaks today apart from his Word.”
March 7th, 2013 at 8:55 pm
This book has done nothing but send me deeper into God”s word and make me more aware than ever of Jesus’s presence in every aspect of my being!
March 7th, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Dr. Horton:
Your statement “However, Paul warns, “Do not go beyond what is written,” since appeals to private revelation breed factions (1 Cor 4:6). Is misused as Barnes notes below the intended meaning of “Not to go beyond what is written.”
Not to go beyond the things which are written (to Mē huper ha gegraptai). It is difficult to reproduce the Greek idiom in English. The article to is in the accusative case as the object of the verb mathēte (learn) and points at the words “Mē huper ha gegraptai,” apparently a proverb or rule, and elliptical in form with no principal verb expressed with mē, whether “think” (Auth.) or “go” (Revised). There was a constant tendency to smooth out Paul’s ellipses as in 2Th_2:3; 1Co_1:26, 1Co_1:31. Lightfoot thinks that Paul may have in mind O.T. passages quoted in 1Co_1:19, 1Co_1:31; 1Co_3:19, 1Co_3:20.
Your interpolation of “since appeals to private revelation breed factions” is your subjective opinion as an addition and has nothing to do with I Cor. 4:6. If I might add- Paul is saying we should not judge men’s ministry except by biblical standards.
March 8th, 2013 at 4:48 am
Dr. Horton,
I am not defending Jesus Calling. It may indeed be deeply flawed and filled with errors.
The Scriptures tell us that God will supply all our needs according to His riches in glory in Christ Jesus.
It is the need of many people today to receive the kind of guidance that the saints of old received by the Spirit. To know where to work, whom to marry, to make tough decisions between two or more choices. That never stopped being a need. People see that as part of genuine intimacy.
As you say, the Scriptures are the perfect public book. The problem is that the Bible’s very publicness imposes natural limits on what it says about individual cases. Jane and Sue may both be wonderful, godly women, but we cannot know what the future holds, so we cannot tell from Scripture whether Sue or Jane will better weather the storms the future might bring. If a man is trying to choose between Jane and Sue, will the Bible tell him which will better weather future storms and prove her to be a better mate for him? Only God knows that. For that man, that information is important to know. It’s a definite need.
We see instances of God in the Scriptures showing specific revelation to specific people in specific situations. We see it in both the Old and New Testament. We even see God speaking by His Spirit to give a “map” of instructions to someone who is not an apostle when He directs Ananias to Paul’s location and tells him what to do for Paul. As powerfully life-changing as the Scriptures are, Aanias would never have gleaned from his Scripture readings the instructions God spoke to him. His was an individual revelation meant for an individual case.
No one is trying to demean the Scriptures. They are indeed the final authority.
But Christians want that kind of intimacy that Ananias experienced when God spoke “extra-biblical revelation” to him. The kind of need in that situation has not gone away.
Should we say that this need is unwarranted? I don’t see how we can. Evidently, from your arguments, you don’t see this as a pressing need. Others do. I know I certainly do.
Do you believe there was no need for God to speak to Ananias regarding Paul the way He did? Do you believe there are NEVER any instances when God would need to speak in the same way to a believer today?
Fact is, God still wants to direct His people in the way He directed Ananias. He does it every day.
March 8th, 2013 at 8:01 am
Dr. Horton –
Well, now you’ve done it! You’ve endorsed historically-Reformed doctrine -again-! And people are surprised!
What’s at stake here, as you have already covered, is really what’s necessary for the church to function as the church. It’s extraordinarily-odd that even though you concede that Jesus could very well speak to you today with any command which pleases Him, and you concede that if Jesus did so it would be required of you to obey that command, those who are here lining up to demand an answer from you are offended because when you make these concessions, you simply ask, “but why would he?”
Indeed: why would he when he has already said more than is necessary for faith and life?
Hang tough, Doctor. This is a hard-hearted crowd.
March 8th, 2013 at 8:04 am
Dan E:
Your complaints have already been answered.
http://kingdomboundbooks.com/pyro_widgets/daGifts_today.pdf
I know that won’t stop you, but people should know that you have been answered before.
March 8th, 2013 at 8:09 am
Great review Dr.Horton!
No matter how inspirational the book might be, a red flag should immediately come up when you hear talk about a secret or new revelation from God and words that emphasize how the book will get you “closer to God’” and/or “feel his presence and peace”…..Scripture alone folks!
March 8th, 2013 at 8:14 am
I was raised in a church that taught the notion that we need to hear from God regarding all the important decisions of life: our marriage partner, our car, careers, etc…
However, the notion that God will share the map of our life with us, give us signs, and tell us what decisions we should make and when we should make them is not taught in Scripture. There is no evidence to suggest that Ananias experienced this divine interaction with God on a daily basis. Nor, does the Scripture suggest that every Christian will experience this audible message from God at least once in their lifetime. To the contrary, the Bible describes a history where at times God spoke to a very few for specific redemptive purposes.
Sure, as Dr. Horton wrote above, there was an age of OT prophets but the topic matter was never about the things that some claim they “need” to know today. In the NT, it is the same. Very few heard the divine voice. And, it was not about what job to take or which person to choose as a mate. (God even inspires Paul to write that whether a person wants to get married is up to them to decide!)
Why is it that there is so much fear in decision making that we “need to hear from God” about whether Sue or Donna will cause us less grief as a marriage partner? Do we really think that it is God’s job to keep us from experiencing the painful trials of life? After all, He did warn men that if they married, they would have trouble.
Or, do we suppose that God is angered and withholds his blessings from us when we make Godly choices? Maybe, it is the thought that we could have had better, easier, more prosperous circumstances marked by more pleasure if only we had waited to hear from God about that recent car purchase?
More importantly, why would we dare to take a collection of biblical accounts that happened over thousands of years and morph them into a “system” for hearing God speak today? Paul never claimed to have that kind of divine guidance every day for every decision? He often writes inspired Scripture that reveal his uncertainty.
Incidentally, the language of the Bible and the experiences of those who really heard God, heard them with their ears! Even the “still, small voice” was truly a voice – heard with his ears. How teachers reference these auditory experiences and then use them as a basis for concluding that the feeling, impression, or thought one is having is really God speaking to them in that moment seems to lack intellectual honesty or biblical warrant.
In the end the God of the Bible doesn’t tell us that we can have certainty when making decisions. But, on the other hand, we don’t have to have fear and worry either. We are free to choose things that are righteous and dedicate them to God asking Him to bless them?
March 8th, 2013 at 12:09 pm
Frank,
The link you posted isn’t on point. I wasn’t talking about charismatic gifts.
The simple question here is whether God still directs people the way He did Ananias. Yes or no?
March 8th, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Doug,
So what you’re saying is that James 1:5 is pointless. There’s really no need to ask God for wisdom, because whatever you chose to do in life is fine so long as it doesn’t violate any major Scriptures.
March 8th, 2013 at 1:04 pm
DLE,
Your question wrongly assumes that God’s choice to use Method M in Situation S to accomplish Result R obligates him to use M given a radically different S and R. Granted, the Scriptures declare that God spoke (M) to Ananias. Can you seriously insist that your “pressing need” to know which woman to marry is in any way equivalent to Saul’s pressing need to hear the gospel from a human agent and that human agent’s pressing need to be assured that said Saul would not take advantage of the situation to crush the Damascene church (S) and that knowing which woman will better weather the storms the future might bring is in any way equivalent to Saul’s carrying the gospel before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel (R)?
The Bible makes it quite clear that God sovereignly unites certain men and women to fulfill his purposes, not infrequently involving their own sin (Lot’s daughters and Bathsheba jump to mind), sometimes involving the decisions of others (cf. Naomi’s finagling on Ruth’s behalf and Saul’s promise(s) of Michal); if my fading memory holds, I can only recall three where the audible voice of God was heard: Adam (just your run-of-the-mill situation?), Isaac (nobody in particular in the history of redemption–but even then the servant heard the voice, not Isaac!) and Hosea (who you can just bet was jumping up and down with joy that God had gotten so intimate with him).
March 8th, 2013 at 1:13 pm
Great to see you posting on the blog Frank.
March 8th, 2013 at 2:38 pm
A link to the Oxford Group —>Two Listeners —>”God Calling” —> they were Buchmanites. This book influenced Sarah Young to write “Jesus Calling.” http://rita66.tripod.com/m-k/buchmanism.htm
It is clear that Buchmanism is not biblical, yet still, many “feel closer” and “experience his Presence” when they read JESUS CALLING which is the grand baby of the Two Listeners. (False Spirit!)
I don’t recall the Bible referring to “The Presence” as a name for Jesus, if He were speaking to Sarah wouldn’t he reveal himself to her with a name she would recognize in Scripture?
Also, people are SO enamored by this book, more than the Bible, this is not right. Seriously, we are defending a book that claims to be the very “words of Jesus”…have we fallen so far to not be able to discern such a false claim? New Agers are all over the Jesus Calling FB page — they LOVE it! Feeling the “Presence” along with all the Christians who are also getting a warm fuzzy from the “Presence.”
As someone mentioned, 2 Timothy 3:16-17 makes it clear as day, that the word of God is all sufficient…I do not need another or other than or something more to make me closer to my Savior. His word is sufficient. The Jesus Calling book is not Jesus speaking. Clearly, it is Sarah calling…making the big bucks and many are learning to listen to another voice that is allegedly, Jesus.
Now, whom to marry – prayer was a part of asking for a certain person to marry for a family member. We asked God through prayer if this was the person He chose. We heard him say, “yes” in our minds. They got engaged. We prayed for the date that would honor the Lord, He gave us the date, in our minds. A wedding dress was bought, a venue booked, etc. a couple of months later the engagement was broken along with broken hearts and a serious doubt if we could ever trust “hearing” from God again.
Did we hear God? Who placed the “yes” and “the date” in our minds?
This brings more questions – how does the enemy lie (deceive) us? Does he place thoughts, doubts, wrong thinking in our mind? If so, wouldn’t the Holy Spirit place thoughts in our mind to comfort us, to teach us, to convict us, to woo the unbeliever to Christ? Doesn’t the power of wisdom come from the indwelling Christ and abicding in His written word?
We are in a “God told me” to do this or that, go here or there, generation, I’m trying to navigate through this time as are many others..not all are “hard -hearted” who have genuine questions – of course some just want to debate for the sake of debate and one up the other. This is not my desire.
March 8th, 2013 at 2:46 pm
DLE,
While clarification of two of your terms (“fine” and “major Scriptures”) in your most recent to Doug might focus your point a tad, the whole challenge remains a strawman because it denies the quite Scriptural reality that God is able to and does answer that necessary prayer in a variety of means contingent to the situation, none of which now, since the advent of his Son and the inscripturation of his Word, require hearing his voice apart from existing means.
Let me turn the question back upon you, DLE. Since you have asserted that situations exist–choice of spouse among them–for which both the Scriptures and natural means are insufficient, do you further assert that all sub-salvific situations require the audible voice of God to convey wisdom? If not, upon what authority are you basing your decision as to what type of situtation requires that voice or not? If so, are you telling us that you will not turn right or left at a traffic light until you hear the eternal Word of God audibly tell you which way to go–as he told Ananias?
March 9th, 2013 at 5:00 am
[...] Michael Horton reviews the very popular devotional Jesus Calling by Sarah Young. In part he writes, “In terms of method, then, Jesus Calling is a “something more” book. At the very least, I believe that it encourages believers to see God’s Word as hum-drum and to ascend into the heavens or descend to the depths to discover a word that will make Jesus more present in our daily lives. According to the Reformation stream of evangelicalism, God speaks to us in his Word (the arrow pointing down from God to us) and we speak to him in prayer (the arrow directed up to God). However, Jesus Calling confuses the direction of these arrows, blurring the distinction between God’s speech and our response.” [...]
March 9th, 2013 at 9:49 am
DLE – I appreciate your comment. In short I believe that the study of James 1:5 does indeed mean that God gives wisdom that I am desperately in need of each and every day. In context it is wisdom for dealing with the trials/temptations of life by recognizing God’s purposes for allowing them and remembering His goodness in the midst of them.
In my post I meant to make the distinction between objective revealed will of God (e.g. no making idols) and subjective wisdom (e.g. I think I should call my parents today, I think we should replace the old car, I think I should fast for a few days next week).
So, the pursuit of wisdom described in the Scriptures (not just James 1:5, God gives us the ability to gain information, thoughtfully evaluate it, and apply it with the confidence to make decisions for His glory. This is an awesome blessing, but it is not certainty.
If one believes that we “hear God” and “have certainty” when we seek “wisdom”, one has to be able to explain the passages in the Bible when those operating front and center in the church in Acts had to live without it. Secondly, this notion creates a moral requirement. One has no choice to do other than what one “hears”. Consequently, in this scheme God not only judges us according to His Word, but according to the “feelings”, “impressions”, and vague “thought” that we had in connection to every decision. For example, if I prayed about marrying Donna and was sure that God “spoke to me” about it, then I should keep myself from all others and pursue her in marriage. But, what if Donna isn’t really interested? What if she is engaged to my friend? What if I “feel” like we should begin a building program and tell the congregation that God “spoke to me about it”. Then, then vote comes down to agreeing with God and me or opposing Him!
The beauty of the Biblical revelation is that God directs all to obey the instructions of our Lord (where His will is revealed), honor their consciences (in matters of conscience) and entertain their preferences (in matters of freedom). All in love.
March 9th, 2013 at 6:58 pm
The James 1:5 passage wording is “let him ask God,” not “let him consult the Scriptures.” One being is asking another being for wisdom. This is a personal appeal. Most personal appeals expect a personal answer.
Dr. Horton has already noted that the Bible is intended as a public book. To that end it speaks to the general public. But not all speech is public. The answers to life are often personal, based on personal situations that are hard to duplicate within a public book.
If all matters of guidance in life were addressed by the Scriptures then there would be no need to ask God for wisdom. All we would need to know for each personal situation that arises in life we could find in the Scriptures because every situation would be addressed.
A soldier is perfectly equipped according to the standards of his training book. But as to where he will be shipped, when, and how, and that information is not found in the training book. Each soldier is complete, but his direction for each battle are unique to his personal situation, and that unique information is critical to winning the battle.
Yes, Jesus gave a public call to go evangelize the world. Acts shows us how the early Christians accepted that call. It also shows us how God spoke to those equipped saints to direct them into unique directions that could not be addressed by the public call.
It is no different today. The Scriptures equip us for the work just as Paul wrote that it equipped the saints back then. But it is God speaking to us by His Holy Spirit who directs us as He pleases, just as He did in Acts.
March 10th, 2013 at 12:59 am
Mr. Initials,
“Let him ask God…” and he will receive wisdom, right?
How?
Is it like, BAM! Or, DING! Where the microwave timer of prayer goes off and then the wisdom comes? Or is it an “if, then,” type thing? If we ask for wisdom, God is obligated to distribute the blessing?
Do we assume that we have understood, mined, and comprehended all that has been infused by God into the inscripturated word of God, and so think it necessary to glean from other, more varied and “personal” sources–or voices–as if they would offer more wisdom then the verifiable Word of God already penned?
Couldn’t we understand more from Scripture then we have already understood, and so gain further wisdom from that written word upon the Spirit’s–God’s very own–enlightening?
Take it for what it’s worth…Call me weak, but I cannot trust my own ability to discern voices and/or revelations, and so “hear God speak,” apart from His very own–endorsed and delivered–written word. Too many times have I failed at this–seeing catastrphe and heart-ache time and again because of my supposed “revelations” from both God’s presence and the Bible (as seen through the lense of “enthusiasm”).
I have hurt those closest to me; punishing my family and almost-friends as a result of my personal quest (obsession)for glory and … “more…”
It is an unquencheable thirst that must die…God help us all. Then, when we know wisdom and ask for it, we will be content to allow God to distribute it as he sees wonderfully and mercifully fit. Remember what the beginning of wisdom is…? I suggest we not stray too far from it.
Outspoken,
Chris Jager,
Tillamook, OR
March 10th, 2013 at 6:04 pm
@terry mingle ” re: dogmatic statement if Christ or Spirit still spoke today.
isnt it obvious. if Christ or the Spirit still spoke today, we would have to cannonize it into scripture. In that case, go ahead and add the Mormon book while your at it, and Mary Baker Eddy and that kid that wrote Heaven is real.
Enjoy your new bible.
jon
March 10th, 2013 at 8:07 pm
DLE,
I’m not sure if you read my post or not…but, I don’t get what you are saying. Of course, I agree that the appeal in James 1:5 is to ask God for for wisdom. Yes, I agree that is a personal request and would expect a personal response from God. And, I agree that that is exactly what we get. We are assured that God will give us what we need to make a well-measured, thoughtful decision.
You seem to be claiming that the answer to the request for wisdom turns out to be divine instruction – a specific word from God that tells you exactly what to do. So, if you pray for wisdom, you get a to-do list. The instruction is like a moral command. It takes no thought. No evaluation. No wisdom at all. Just do what God tells you to do and you will be in good stead with God.
It is telling that you don’t say anything about the many biblical examples where Christians did not have certainty. They didn’t have a word from the Lord telling them exactly what to do. Either you are not aware of them or you are ignoring them.
Just take the one example of Paul and Barnabas disagreeing about taking John Mark on the second missionary trip and explain your interpretation of their actions and the church’s prayer in light of your theory of “wisdom”.
I would humbly suggest that you need to be able to address all the texts where Christians didn’t have certainty, but at least take this one and explain why Paul and Barnabas and the entire church had to deal with a sharp disagreement and just pressed on for the glory of God.
It would also be interesting to read your response to the example you raised about knowing who to marry when God clearly says that if you want to marry or not is completely up to the person considering it. What do you expect God to tell you if he has already told you that the decision is up to you? And, of course warned you, that if you marry, you will have trouble?
Wisdom in the Scriptures is the object of a lifelong pursuit for a clear perspective, recognition of godly values, the ability to be in a blessed position to gain needed information, to weigh the pros and cons and to apply that knowledge in the various contexts of life. Your notion of wisdom is more akin to getting an email from God that tells you what exactly to do tomorrow.
So, if you will not explain your viewpoint in light of these two Scriptures (or others that left Christians uncertain as to what exactly to do), what is it that you are really seeking here?
March 11th, 2013 at 8:42 am
@jonathan martinez
Excellent point, Jonathan! The Qur’an as well, while we’re at it, according to a certain prophet’s testimony, records the very words he heard from God.
Although I’d also push for balancing him out with some of the more … soothing things … that Walt Whitman heard.
March 11th, 2013 at 9:00 am
[...] Michael Horton reviews one of the best-selling Christians books currently: Jesus Calling by Sarah Young. A portion: The substance of the book is drawn from the wells of the Keswick or “higher life/victorious life” movement that B. B. Warfield critiqued so thoroughly at the turn of the twentieth century in his massive study, Perfectionism. Based on the Wesleyan notion of two acts of faith—one for justification and another for sanctification, the Keswick teaching calls believers to enter into the “higher life.” While they are saved, many believers fail to experience the presence of Jesus in their daily lives. By “surrendering all,” letting go of their attachment to the things of this world, and striving to enter into this realm of ultimate peace, believers can attain a perpetual state of victory. As Warfield pointed out, the movement exhibited a deep inner contradiction in its message. On the one hand, you aren’t supposed to do anything, but simply rest in Jesus. Leave off striving! On the other hand, there are many things that you have to strive to do in order to enter into the higher life. Warfield traced the lineage back to Germany mysticism. [...]
March 11th, 2013 at 12:16 pm
Sounds like more of the Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, and Steven Furtick “believe-in-yourself” type of christianity. Christ is being used as a tool for self empowerment, Norman Vincent Peale started the whole thing. No different from Tony Robbins and “The Secret”, it all comes down for the search for inner power. This sounds more like a highway to hell, than the gospel of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins.
March 12th, 2013 at 4:01 am
[...] Review of Jesus Calling [...]
March 13th, 2013 at 3:22 pm
[...] from: M.Horton Share this:FacebookTwitterGoogle +1PinterestLike this:Like Loading… This entry was posted in Church. Bookmark the permalink. ← Much like lead poisoning, false teaching slowly kills its advocates unbeknownst to them. [...]
March 14th, 2013 at 12:03 pm
DLE,
Doug is absolutely right. DLE, You are correct that we should be asking God and believing him to supply wisdom (James 1:5). But the way you describe it, you are advocating not that God supply wisdom to us so that we can then make wise choices and decisions in the circumstances in our lives but rather that God make our decisions for us and then let us know what he has decided. When you ask God for wisdom and then wait for specific direction on your decision or choice, you are bypassing the wisdom God supplies. God supplies wisdom which the Christian must then apply to his own situation and work out how that wisdom from God informs and illuminates his circumstance, decision or situation. A person must still make the decision after applying the wisdom that God supplies. Asking God if you should marry Betty or Suzy is not the same as asking God for wisdom about who you ought to marry, its actually the opposite of asking for God’s wisdom. It God really wants us to ask him to provide specific answers for your life decisions, we wouldn’t need wisdom. Asking God for wisdom and searching the Scriptures for it go hand in hand. Asking God for specific answers to our questions is using God like a wija board. This is definitely not what we see in Acts.
March 15th, 2013 at 10:32 am
As an alternative to “Jesus Calling”, may I recommend “The Abundant Life Daybook” by Nancy Guthrie. This book also speaks in the first person, but Nancy Guthrie emphasizes in her introduction that it is just a literary device to get you thinking. Maybe we can share this book with our “Jesus Calling” loving friends.
March 15th, 2013 at 2:25 pm
Can I just note that all the most doctrinally thinned-out and wobbly material is marketed to women? Much of the Christian bookstore junk would never stand on its own, but put it in a devotional or study group format and target it toward women and suddenly lying about God is just “meeting women where they’re at”. I’m so tired of being told that my “woman’s heart” is supposed to thrive on something other than the truth.
March 16th, 2013 at 10:51 am
Having been in a strain of Christianity (1970s, early 80s) that bought into Andrew Murray, the “higher life”, Brother Lawrence, Watchman Nee, etc. I want to thank Dr. Horton for his review of this book. The mystical/subjective experience as some kind of royal road to knowing God is as old as the gnostics. To walk by experience, which is where this book points, is to leave walking by faith alone in Christ and his finished work of salvation for us. Subjective xperience gives a thrill and like “Turkish Delight” can be addictive and often deceptive. Indeed, a shaky ground of sand to walk upon to find truth and know Christ.
Looking for wisdom? One might consult the corporate wisdom of the church confessions and catechisms which came out of the Reformation before reinventing the wheel through one’s own direct line to God.
WCF 1-
6. The whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man’s salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the inward illumination of the Spirit of God to be necessary for the saving understanding of such things as are revealed in the Word: and that there are some circumstances concerning the worship of God, and government of the church, common to human actions and societies, which are to be ordered by the light of nature, and Christian prudence, according to the general rules of the Word, which are always to be observed.
7. All things in Scripture are not alike plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all: yet those things which are necessary to be known, believed, and observed for salvation, are so clearly propounded, and opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the learned, but the unlearned, in a due use of the ordinary means, may attain unto a sufficient understanding of them.
March 17th, 2013 at 10:54 am
I am tired of Christians bashing each other on these websites. Come on guys! Learn to disagree in an agreeable manner! Imagine if a curious non-Christian was reading this! (sorry my attempt at encouragement under the influence of frustration.)
March 19th, 2013 at 6:25 pm
DLE and PDC, thumbs up! In the quest to have sound theology, so many people turn into attack dogs! I agree with the author that we need to have sound theology that lines up with scripture and not misrepresent Jesus, but I also have read in the Bible examples of God speaking by other means besides written scriptures. I have a relationship with Jesus. I read his word, talk to him, and he speaks to me through his word, and he also speaks back to me. Jesus loves us. He cares about every detail of our lives and I believe He loves it when we want him to be involved in every bit our lives. I went through a horrible situation where my husband left me destitute and chose to be with another woman. I asked God to tell me how He viewed me. He answered me in clear words, “I love you and you are precious.” I could have received the same message by reading the Bible, but God is good and chose to answer my request at that moment by speaking to me directly. By holding fast to a particular theological camp, we may be missing out on Jesus and the love that he wants to pour into our hearts and lives.
March 21st, 2013 at 2:56 am
Michael if there is any thing I can understand its the dangers involved in all of the subjective and mystical etc. ways we like to experience God. Having said that, I’m not ready to say that God is totally inactive in our life apart from the reading of the Word. Does the Lord speak to, or convict our conscience when we sin? Does He place burdens and desires in our hearts to pray for one another, help one another, or to be in a ministry or job, etc? Is He active in our life, working out events in Providence? Does He guide us, though not perceived, by His Spirit, to do this or that? Does He bring thoughts/scriptures to our remembrance? Or is all of the above void? No working of the Spirit except to illuminate the Word.
I realize that we are all subject to error and deception regarding these things. But I like to think that God does not need our help managing that problem either. He has given us His Word to check and compare against any activity in our life that seems to be from Him. And we should first and foremost, hold the Word as the supreme authority for our lives. And as the primary way in which He speaks to us. We should not become dependent on extra-biblical activity as the Charismatics are. Or hooked on excitements of the spiritual kind. Jesus is “The Word.” And to love the Word, is to love Jesus. Outside activity may occur, especially in times of suffering, but they are far from the norm.
March 27th, 2013 at 9:52 pm
Rebekah and Stuart, although it is certainly true that God reveals himself in other ways and communicates with us, this is because God loves everybody. Matthew 5:45 is clear, God makes the sun shine on the evil and on the good and he sends rain on the just and on the unjust. So it is absolutely clear that God’s goodness is revealed outside his word. Mike Horton who is reformed would refer to this as common grace or what Calvin calls God’s providence on every man. This providence holds the universe together and is a universal grace outside God’s word. Lutherans also recognize the universal providence of God (the only difference is that lutherans go further than the reformed by saying that God is loving in word and sacrament to everybody, there is no reprobation in lutheranism). So both lutherans and reformed agree with regard to God’s universal providence, with that said in matters of salvation God speaks solely through his word and sacrament. And here lutherans and reformed agree that natural revelation is not sufficient for salvation, God’s saving grace is not given outside word and sacrament. So I have to back up Mike Horton, his teaching is consistent with the bible, in that God does not save outside his preached word. Rebekah and Stuart, though I sympathize with what you point out, I must add that what you guys are referring to is God’s providence which indeed operates outside his word, but this providence does not effect salvation in man due to man’s sinful nature. It does benefit man greatly, as Matthew 5:45 indicates, all of mankind benefits equally, as God sends his shine and rain without discriminating between believer and unbeliever.
March 27th, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Stuart and Rebekah further to my last post let me add:
Acts 14:16-17 is also clear proof that God does speak outside his word when Paul tells the greeks: “In past generations he allowed all the nations to walk in their own ways. Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying your hearts with food and gladness.”
God never leaves himself without a witness as Acts 14:17 shows. This is why people that go through tough times like Rebekah did God strengthens them without reading the bible as she points out. Now God does this to unbelievers as well as Paul told the greek, that God was kind to them and filled their hearts with food and gladness. My mom for example who never read the bible tells me that God strengthens her every day to perform her tasks. I know a native american business leader who prays to the creator every morning asking him for strength for the day’s tasks and God does respond. Even though people don’t know God, God is still kind and responsive to them Acts 14:17
Now the question is not whether God reveals himself outside his word or not, we all know he does and the bible teaches this. And Mike Horton and reformed theology agree with this. The question is this can we be saved outside God’s word through other revelation? The Reformers would answer with a no to this question. Although God is kind to every man and he can be perceived by everybody, Romans 1 and Romans 10:18 attest to this, the problem is that man is sinful and man rejects God. Scripture teaches that for man to be saved God needs to intervene and through his preached word create faith in his elect. This is why Paul can tell the ephesians by grace you have been saved through faith and this is not of yourself but it’s a gift of God. And Romans 10:17 “So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” further emphasizes that outside God’s word there is no salvation. It is in this saving sense that we say that God does not reveal himself nor communicates with us outside his preached word and sacrament.
March 27th, 2013 at 11:16 pm
And to sum things up, here’s the problem with the book “Jesus Calling”, a Jesus outside the preached word is the God of Acts 17:23 , the unknown God. Any book that talks about Christ outside the preached word and sacrament appeals to the flesh and the unbeliever, the unbeliever needs to be sustained when he goes through a divorce, or loses a loved one, loses his job, has health problems, his investments in the stock market go down and so forth. Now as I said God does this and I don’t want to minimize the importance of God revealed outside his preached word, nevertheless this falls under the realm of God’s providence to believer and unbeliever alike, and it’s not something that pertains to the christian. It’s something that the christian and the unbeliever have in common, this is why the Reformed call it common grace.
April 22nd, 2013 at 6:18 am
[...] From Michael Horton via The Whitehorse Inn Blogg: Review of Jesus Calling [...]
May 14th, 2013 at 1:53 am
[...] http://www.whitehorseinn.org/blog/2013/03/05/review-of-jesus-calling/ [...]