What’s a Routine Traffic Stop? It All Depends
Looking at the Trayvon Martin Case from an African-American Perspective
By Ken Jones | Pastor, Glendale Baptist Church (Miami, FL) and Co-Host, White Horse Inn

On Tuesday, May 8, 2012, I was looking out of my office window at approximately 3:30, in the afternoon. Our church sits on a busy street just above an on-and-off ramp for the turnpike. So I was not surprised to see a car turn into our driveway (this often happens when a driver has missed the on ramp or has gone the wrong direction when getting off of the turnpike). What caught my attention about this car is that it was actually being directed into our lot by a police car. Apparently there was some sort of traffic violation and the police officer pulled the violator out of the busy traffic into our parking lot to write him up.
I went back to my desk and after about twenty minutes I peeked out the window and there was a young African-American male with hands spread on the hood of his car as he was being patted down by the officer. Most traffic violations don’t require a body search or pat down, so I headed out to the parking lot for a closer look.
Not wanting to jump to a conclusion, and doing the best that I could to suppress the familiar anger that accompanies the conclusion that I was trying not to jump to, I first went to my car that was parked several feet away from the incident but still in view. By the time I reached my car the young man was seated on the ground as the officer proceeded to search both the trunk and glove box of his car. At this point I walked towards the scene and from a distance I informed the officer that I was the pastor of the church and asked if everything was alright, to which he replied “yes”, just a routine traffic stop. I stood by the door of the building for a few minutes before returning to my office. When I looked back outside, the officer was handing the young man a ticket and within a few minutes they were both gone.
The words resonated in my mind “routine traffic stop.” I had received a traffic ticket a few weeks earlier, a procedure that took all of ten minutes, with my glove box being opened by me to get out my registration. I never got out of my vehicle, was not searched or patted down and my trunk was not opened. I thought my experience which also ended with a citation was a routine traffic stop. But then I thought about the conclusion that I had tried to avoid jumping to, and I understood the truthfulness of the officer’s words.
In far too many instances when young black males are involved this is “the routine.” I recalled incidents from my youth in South Central Los Angeles, where standing on the street with two or three friends would prompt a U-turn from law enforcement passing by. We would be told by these officers of the law that we were gang members (when we weren’t); that we matched the description of perpetrators of some crime in the area, or they were sure we were on our way to no good. That was “routine.” It was also routine, when I started driving, to be pulled over and detained for up to an hour. When my son came of age it was also routine for him to be detained on his way home from his university job for similar periods of time. There seems to be something suspicious about young African males that warrants re-defining “routine” when dealing with them.
Whatever else is associated with the Trayvon Martin case; what gnaws on me is the suspicion that he was deemed a suspicious character and therefore a threat. In the incident that occurred in our church parking lot, I intentionally did not mention the race of the police officer because this not wholly a race issue. Many of the officers who gave out the harshest treatment in our South Central neighborhood were themselves African-American. This is about prejudice in the name of prevention and the subjects of this prejudicial action in far too many cases are young African-American males who seem to be perceived as a threat. Geraldo Rivera suggested that the hoodie worn by Trayvon Martin made him suspicious, and that Hispanic and African-American parents should not allow their teens to wear them.
Last summer, I spoke at the Legacy Conference in Chicago where there were braids, tattoos and hoodies galore, adorned by young people who devoted three days to the study of God’s word and taking it to the streets. Whether we like the fashion of our young people or not, is beside the point. Fashion has always been a part of youth rebellion. After all, suburban youth of different ethnicities who often share the fashion of urban youth are not subject to the same “routine” as young African-American males.
In the past, this prejudice in the name of prevention has come from law enforcement. In the Trayvon Martin case, it was from a neighborhood watch person. I pray that the judicial process will render a just ruling. But here is my greater desire that young men of color will become subjects of actual “routine” traffic stops and not suspicious characters because of their age, color or attire.


May 17th, 2012 at 11:39 am
Ken have you seen the most recent medical report which indicates Zimmerman’s version may well be the truth? He did have head injuries consistent with his story. He may well have been attacked first and violently. I pray we can all wait for ALL the evidence to be brought out and that justice will be truely done for both parties.
May 17th, 2012 at 12:01 pm
Karen:
This is what he is talking about. Trayvon, was the one being pursued, that is a fact, that is not even disputed. The one at fault was Zimmerman from the start. the 911 tapes even show that. There would have been no encounter had Zimmerman not profiled Trayvon, pursued him, got out of his car and approched him.
May 17th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
John read my comment again. LATER evidence indicates first reports may have been in error. Let us wait for ALL the evidence before we render judgement.
May 17th, 2012 at 1:07 pm
”prejudice in the name of prevention ”. This phrase strikes me the most. I think the discussion would be better served if we talk about not just one case, but a pattern of behaviors we see in our own daily lives and in the media. And based on that, there is no question that many people feel it is legtimate to use race as an element in the name of prevention of potential criminal activity.
After 9-11 it was quite common to hear that while we should not target people based on religious affiliation, but country of origin which is largely tied to ethnic groups in many cases. I know of an ex police officer who told me that while he wasn’t racist, he would always deal with African Americans with another person and never alone. With whites and asians he felt he was ok by himself because he was white himself and ”asians don’t make trouble”.
Furthermore, back in the days between WWI and WWII, my great grandfather actually converted to Roman Catholicism because where he lived in Chicago was so Anti-German, that he abandoned Lutheranism and married my Great Grandmother an Irish Roman Catholic.
Finally, only a couple years ago, when a project was being realized (plans going years back) for an Islamic center in New York city, many leading figures including John McCain, Sarah Palin,Joe Liberman, Harry Reid, and Mitt Romney, all condemned it, despite it being 2 blocks away from the actual site (which is an irrelevant fact). Many people of both political persuasions tried to stop the free exercise of religion and engaged in public bigotry.
Prejudice, racism, and bigotry are not alone in the US. It exists all over the world. it is apart of our fallen nature, I am firmly convinced of that. To judge a person as an individual and not by those with whom they maybe associated is a hard and complex thing. But I am firmly convinced that it is right. The monsters are not just those on Mapple Street, they are us. And we have to remember that.
May 17th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
Ken,
For law enforcement personnel there is no such thing as a “routine” traffic stop. That kind of thinking will get you killed. You can bet that when I stopped skin heads or outlaw motorcycle gang members I took extra precautions to make sure I went home after my shift. Now these young white men may have just liked the fashion statement but I did not take any chances.
Maybe parents should teach their children not dress like a thug for the same reason deer hunters don’t walk around the woods with antlers on their heads. If you know it is going to draw the wrong kind of attention it only makes sense you would dress differently. As a father I enforced proper attire for my children and that included how to interact with anyone in authority.
John M,
Even if Zimmerman did everything you said (which is not clear yet) it is not against the law to follow someone down a public street. It may not be the smartest thing to do but it is not illegal. Trayvon had a phone and could have called 911 and had Zimmerman checked out if he thought he was a threat.
May 17th, 2012 at 1:40 pm
First, I am sure there is prejudice out there, on all sides and in all races. We are sinners living in a fallen world. But, just because the young black male you saw was asked to exit his car and to submit to a search does not mean that the request was based on prejudice. I am a middle-aged white guy and the same thing happened to me a few years ago, in broad daylight, wearing a suit and tie, for an expired tag.
Second, please understand that the officer is not omniscient, he does not know when a routine stop will suddenly pose a threat to his life. Officers are killed far too frequently in what appeared to be a routine traffic stop. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/23/state-trooper-killed-washington_n_1296417.html
Finally, with respect to the Martin case: It is a terrible tragedy, but I don’t see any evidence the shooting had anything to do with race. On the 911 call, Zimmerman said that the guy was acting funny, might be on drugs, looking around in the rain–he was not just walking down the sidewalk–in an area where that had been break-ins recently. The race of Martin and his hoodie only came up when the dispatcher asked for a description. In other words, those facts (race and apparel) were incidental to the case, that is NOT what made Zimmerman call.
Really, Pastor Jones, if your home or church had recently been broken into, and you saw someone looking and acting suspiciously, white, black, brown, yellow, would you not investigate it–just because your home is not the target this time? Let’s not be afraid to “play the man” when circumstances call for it. I Cor. 6:13
If Zimmerman actly wrongfully, I want him to be prosecuted, he took a life. But if he was doing nothing more than questioning a suspicious character in his neighborhood–which he has every right to do–and Martin attacked him to the point of fearing for his life, Zimmerman did right in protecting himself. I agree that we dont’ know all the facts yet, but the facts that have come out so far have all supported Zimmerman’s side of the story.
May 17th, 2012 at 3:29 pm
Oh if it were only one traffic stop. I’ve heard the “you match the description of a bank robbery in the area” excuse for pulling three young black men over without cause. I’ve heard the “what are you doing on this side of town” excuse. I’ve been pulled over and given no reason. I’ve had my car illegally searched. I’ve been pulled over for passing another car while doing 40 mph…in a 45 mph zone.
None of these resulted in a ticket because there was no violation committed. My only offense was driving while black. I wish it ended there, but there’s not enough space or time.
I don’t know all the details with the Zimmerman/Martin case. However, to quote Ken Jones, “There seems to be something suspicious about young African males that warrants re-defining “routine” when dealing with them.
Whatever else is associated with the Trayvon Martin case; what gnaws on me is the suspicion that he was deemed a suspicious character and therefore a threat.”
May 17th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
>>>> what gnaws on me is the suspicion that he was deemed a suspicious character and therefore a threat.<<<<
That should gnaw on you. It should gnaw on you until Mr. Zimmerman's trial is over and you have opportunity to discover why he thought Martin was a threat. Otherwise you'd be as unjust as all of those who treated you unfairly in the past.
However, what will not come out in court is why Mr. Zimmerman was quickly labeled a "white Hispanic." I've seen Federal census forms and HIPPA forms but I've never seen the category of "white Hispanic" listed as an option. If the media had taken the same tack as Pastor Ken Jones and had not focussed on the appearance of Zimmerman, this case may not have created quite the furor.
May 17th, 2012 at 6:45 pm
Paul, you must not pay close attention to census forms. On those forms, the question of what someone’s race is is a separate from the question of whether they are Hispanic. Just search for “sample census form.” Hispanics will identify with White, Black, American Indian, or some combination.
May 17th, 2012 at 7:01 pm
I’m glad that our Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit have not been dragged into this discussion. I come to this blog because I hope to better understand what I believe and why I believe it as it relates to God, especially as the Bible illuminates. I come to be spiritually challenged and to have my Biblical worldview stimulated. I was so disappointed to find this line of discourse here. I have no problem with the content of the discussion but it saddens me that this blog has now been used for people’s opinion’s unrelated to the Gospel or anything associated with the Bible. Is it the last call at the Inn?
May 17th, 2012 at 8:37 pm
Scott:
I stand corrected re: the Census form. However, the form asks that a person “self identify.” In this particular case, it made for better copy to identify the man as a “white” hispanic. Even though, one of his grandfathers was a “black” Peruvian.
My point is that this case became the target of the media spotlight because of the
“white” / “black” connection.
May 17th, 2012 at 9:56 pm
I am white and was detained in a poor black/hispanic neighborhood and searched for over half an hour. I was early to the movies, and decided to drive around until the movie started. I ended up in a bad place, and the cop said the only reason white people go into the neighborhood is to buy drugs (the cops were white). So here are white cops acting racist against a white person, go figure.
May 17th, 2012 at 9:59 pm
And I have no problem with profiling people with hoodies. Everyone knows that criminals often put on a hoodie before committing a crime so it is harder to identify them. I sometimes where a hoodie, and I have the common sense to know that some people might look at me suspiciously, that’s just reality. It’s NOT the same thing as racism.
May 17th, 2012 at 10:06 pm
In the state of Indiana, if a policeman stops a car for a violation of traffic laws, and the driver is white, there is a 20% probablity that there is a handgun in the car. If the driver is black, the probability is 80%. Most policeman that are shot dead at a traffic stop are killed by a black man, even though the black population in this state is under 15%.
Whether these facts are causes or effects is of no concern to the policeman. He just wants to live to see his family that night, so he is going to play the probabilities.
Don’t expect the cycle to be broken by the guy who is putting his life on the line.
May 17th, 2012 at 10:09 pm
Ken,
I’m very disappointed in you on this. As a “white” Christian police officer, I feel that you yourself are stereotyping…the cops. I work in a city where the majority of people are white. They get pulled over plenty of times and many are searched. So it’s not necessarily an issue of race but you seem to be saying it is. The police officer who told you it was a routine stop was probably trying to help you not worry. I very sorry for what happened to you as a child, but I’m afraid your wrong on this issue and hope you reconsider. Maybe consider doing a ride along with the police in your area to help you understand the danger they face…
God bless you and your minitry
May 18th, 2012 at 12:32 am
Isn’t race a concept that came out of something called darwinism? If we are all descended from Adam and Eve then race is built on a lie.
May 18th, 2012 at 5:17 am
John, not really. Before Darwin published his work there was an alternate theory that the different “races” of man had separate origins. Darwin affirmed that they had a common origin. I agree, though, that the concept of race is a social construct, but since people give it such meaning and importance it has a real impact in our lives.
May 18th, 2012 at 6:10 am
Update: The autopsy just released shows that Martin had pot in his system. Does that means he deserved to die? No, but it does give credibility to what Zimmerman said on the 911 call about Martin acting funny like he was on drugs-and also could support the idea that Martin reacted violently to Zimmerman’s following him or asking him what he was doing (if that is what the evidence shows).
Still, this case is a terribly sad thing. I have kids Trayvon’s age. I hurt for his parents and friends. But that does not mean that Zimmerman deserves to be offered up on the altar of righting society’s or history’s wrongs.
Dennis, a poster above, I respectfully disagree with your premise that WHI blog shouldn’t delve into questions like this. I think it is kind of cool. Christians, from different backgrounds and perspectives, respectfully commenting on our society and our cultural context. Now, I would not want man’s opinions “preached” from the pulpit every Sunday. But, an occasional deviation into culture (and really it does touch on theology, has Zimmerman violated the commandment not to kill, was he just defending himself, was he loving his neighbor) on a blog–even WHI blog is okay by me.
May 18th, 2012 at 8:08 am
Dennis,
Issues related to the gospel are the primary focus of the WHI blog. But we also occasionally use it to tackle issues of the day. This is not a church setting, but a conversation. It’s not the pulpit, but the water cooler. But stick around and you’re sure to find a lot more discussion about what we believe and why…
May 18th, 2012 at 8:48 am
I understand that this blog can be a water cooler discussion but I only wish that the discussion was somehow related to something biblical(the mention of Zimmerman violating a commandment being the exception). Even Michael Horton’s upcoming talk on voting involves Jesus. Sadly this discussion is a water cooler conversation devoid of Jesus. Ken’s post has nothing of God in it(which I found unusual as I’ve come to appreciate Ken’s biblical perspective).
May 18th, 2012 at 9:07 am
Scott,
You are correct. I should have said, the disciples of Darwin are the ones who “mainstreamed” the idea that one race was superior to another race. Also there is no denying that it affects us today and no doubt the evil one has his steamy claws in the mix.
May 18th, 2012 at 7:45 pm
I agree with John John E (May 17th, 2012 at 1:11 pm): “Maybe parents should teach their children not dress like a thug for the same reason deer hunters don’t walk around the woods with antlers on their heads. If you know it is going to draw the wrong kind of attention it only makes sense you would dress differently.”
Sure, we wish we didn’t have to disciminate based on appearance. In a perfect world, we wouldn’t. But in this world, we must at times, to survive. Forget race. The way we dress tells the world if they should be afaid of you or not. You tell me what a young woman should do if she has two directions she can go: one road has a group of 5 “thug looking” (yes, there is a distinguished look) guys coming down the street “hooping and hollering” loudly. The other street has a well-dressed business man. Clearly, the odds are in favor of the business man. He could be a perv but the percentages will still be in his favor. This is life. I agree with John E., don’t dress like a thug if you don’t want to be mistaken for one. I could dress “gothic” but then I also have to expect people the local 7-11 to watch me like a hawk (worried I might steal something). If I dress in business atire, I get a lot more respect. It’s all in how we choose to represent ourselves.
May 19th, 2012 at 12:59 am
John McElhaney said: “Trayvon, was the one being pursued, that is a fact, that is not even disputed… There would have been no encounter had Zimmerman not profiled Trayvon, pursued him, got out of his and approached him.”
Mr. McElhaney, upon more careful review of the 911 tapes and other evidence, it has now been shown that it is NOT an undisputed fact that Zimmerman pursued Trayvon and approached him. In fact, the evidence strongly disputes that occurred and strongly suggests Zimmerman STOPPED a few seconds after leaving his vehicle as requested by the dispatcher after he had already left said vehicle, calmly talked with her for over a minute and a half, and was on his way back to his vehicle when he was confronted by Trayvon, who had ***doubled back and gone back to the direction of Zimmerman and his vehicle*** and ***initiated a second confrontation with Zimmerman***.
Please review the info in the following pages. Thank you.
dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/911-call-shows-zimmerman-stopped-following-martin-after-dispatchers-request-corroborates-story/?print=1
wagist.com/2012/dan-linehan/evidence-that-trayvon-martin-doubled-back
wagist.com/2012/dan-linehan/the-missing-230-and-deedees-testimony
May 19th, 2012 at 8:32 pm
>>>>In the past, this prejudice in the name of prevention has come from law enforcement. In the Trayvon Martin case, it was from a neighborhood watch person. I pray that the judicial process will render a just ruling.<<<<
I'm surprised that this part of the article has not been commented upon. The premise is that young black men are unjustly harassed by the police because of a "prejudice in the name of prevention." In the Martin-Zimmerman case, we see "prejudice in the name of prevention" at work again but this time, unfortunately, Mr. Martin is killed. "Justice," therefore, demands that Mr. Zimmerman go up the river.
No sooner were these remarks posted, when, additional evidence surfaced. Evidence can sometimes make life difficult for prosecutors because now the case, Pastor Jones' insight into Mr. Zimmerman's motives notwithstanding, isn't quite so open and shut. If the prosecutor, the judge and the jury fail to deliver a "just ruling," there are going to be riots.
There are much better ways to argue "prejudice in the name of prevention" than to attach it to this case and assign it as motive to Mr. Zimmerman.
May 20th, 2012 at 1:53 pm
Of course young black men are profiled. I profile all types of people for all types of reasons, some good and some bad. Typically we profile people because of experience and this is wise, though it is never an absolute. It is sad that young black men commit to large of a percentage of violent crime that all black men are normally profiled, but this is life in an imperfect and fallen world.
But here is the conundrum that inner city blacks must deal with. They complain when cops are extra diligent and sometimes what seem to be harassing, but on the other hand they complain about the high rate of crime. It seems whatever actions are taken there will be complaints. I for one understands it comes with the territorory when one is part of group that is associated with certain characteristics. The way to change this is to break the link to this trait, and not continue to enforce it. so the 800lb gorilla in the room has always been why is the crime rate so high amongst young blacks and how do we change it?
May 21st, 2012 at 4:07 pm
I understand everything you are saying, Ken. It’s not a comprehensive overview of the Martin/Zimmerman case. It’s an attempt to convey why there is such an uproar about it in the African-American community.
I appreciate the limited scope of your article. Your points are clear and illustrate a valid concern. As for the larger questions concerning Mr. Zimmerman and the law, that is for lawyers and a jury to sort out.
Thank you for your insight.
May 23rd, 2012 at 8:25 pm
>>>>It’s an attempt to convey why there is such an uproar about it in the African-American community.<<<<
If this is the case, the attempt failed. Dr. Thomas Sowell, Dr. Walter E. Williams and Dr. Shelby Steele, all of them black Americans, have provided far different opinions than the one provided by Pastor Ken Jones.
Having the local media butcher the initial story, followed by two rabble rousers jumping into the fray with the President of the United States offering his two cents shortly thereafter . . . do not these things alone begin to explain the uproar in the black community? Might there be a name for this sort of thing? Dr. Walter E. Williams has been calling it by name for years. Are there other tragedies taking place in every day in the black community that go unnoticed? Dr. Shelby Steele says America ought to be ashamed for overlooking them. What does this case and the Jim Crow South have in common? Dr. Thomas Sowell explains that one.
March 16th, 2013 at 8:57 pm
When I was a kid I didn’t know “blacks” were any more different from me than redheads, and while I sadly regret discrimination by law enforcement (I just recently got a ticket myself) it’s clear to me that it’s as much a result of our society’s rejection of God as anything, showing Dostoyevsky was right in the Brothers Karamozov that “Without God anything (evil) is possible). Sadly it seems most “blacks” and Dems want this discrimination to continue like they do poverty for the continued exploitation of minorities & women in order to maintain their power, like Arab exploitation of the Palestinians, not caring how many have to suffer. I sometimes wonder how much we really care when I consider that we knew it required war to end slavery but butchering babies is no big deal we’ll leave up to God to deal with. Soli Deo gloria!