Christianity and Politics, Progressive Style
Guest-Post by Brian Lee, pastor of Christ Reformed Church in Washington, DC (which worships in Teddy Roosevelt’s church).
It is amazing how quickly we forget that the confusion of Christianity with politics has happened on both sides of the political spectrum.
Theodore Roosevelt broke from the Republican Party in 1912 to form a third, Progressive Party for his presidential run — the so-called “Bull Moose Party,” so named because Roosevelt said he felt like a “bull moose” after bolting the Republicans. Sporting red bandanas (symbolizing the rise of the proletariat) and viewed as radicals by establishment Democrats and Republicans, the Progressives gathered for their nominating convention in Chicago in August 1912.
The convention was a historic event in American politics, marking the first time a candidate appeared at his own nominating convention. But perhaps most remarkable was its religious fervor, well detailed in Edmund Morris’s Colonel Roosevelt. The New York Times reporter wrote, “It was not a convention at all; it was an assemblage of religious enthusiasts.”
As Roosevelt mounted the stage preparing to speak, he led the assembly in the singing of “Onward, Christian Soldiers” and “The Battle Hymn of the Republic.” Roosevelt’s address was entitled, “A Confession of Faith,” and it closed with a motto he had already invoked at the Republican convention weeks earlier, “We stand at Armaggedon, and we battle for the Lord.” As Morris notes, “If Progressivism was, as more and more critics were suggesting, a religion, it needed its mantras.” A tumult ensued — “enthusiasm turned to ecstasy” — and ten thousand voices sang Roosevelt’s name to the tune of “Maryland, my Maryland.”
The convention closed with the singing of the Doxology.


July 12th, 2011 at 9:10 am
Never knew that. Pretty powerful stuff. That word, “Progressive,” as applied to politics has surely gone through some revisions in the last 100 years!
July 12th, 2011 at 1:39 pm
Recommend you read the book, “The War for Righteousness,” about the Progressives and the entry into WWI–how postmill expectations drove a lot of the progessive legislation and WWI.
July 13th, 2011 at 8:01 pm
Scary stuff. Not much has changed.
July 18th, 2011 at 9:07 pm
1 Peter 1:13-14 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, 14 or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right.
Who defines wrong and right? Natural Law? Surely Pontius Pilate was familiar with a concept not unlike natural law yet he asked Jesus, “What is Truth?” Ultimately, wrong and right are determined by the Scriptures. The Scriptures teach that marriage is between one man and one woman. The Scriptures call homosexuality a sin. The Scriptures teach that abortion is murder.
In a representative republic, citizens and especially Christian citizens have an obligation to support agendas of right and oppose agendas of wrong. Otherwise, as Caesar, we are on the wrong side of God’s law.
Ideas of right and wrong are hopefully shaped by the Church. If the Church does not show people what the Scriptures teach with respect to right and wrong, the Church is derelict in its duty. Once I’ve been taught, should I not also be encouraged to employ my knowledge by at least voting and maybe even actively participating in a process that is designed to represent me?
Probably the reason that politics and religious views have been seen together on a number of occasions in American history is because up until 1776, the people never had that option. Right laws and right religion were what the kings said they were.
August 21st, 2011 at 11:35 am
I think, unfortunately, politics have mingled with religion. My MORAL beliefs are conservative. However, I am intelligent enough to separate my moral beliefs with the constitutional rights of other Americans. I do not think that violates my mandate as a believer. NO WHERE in scripture does G-d take away the RIGHT to make a choice from anyone. G-d gives us direction. He did not make us into robots with no free will. Nor should our own religious convictions remove free will from other people. We are not greater than the ALmighty!! Hence, I believe that all persons should have equalateral rights. I believe that all persons should have equalateral accesses. I believe that all persons should enjoy equalateral benefits from being a citizen and tax payor of this great country. I also believe that making the WRONG choices can and will have consequences but that does not give me the mandate to REMOVE those choices, given that they are not harmful to others in society. Hence, while I personally do not advocate same sex marriages, I do not believe that it is my job to deny the right to choose. The problem with the conservative right wing is that they believe they have the right to choose right and wrong for ALL of America based upon their own narrow point of view.